Medical Tourism

What Does a Gleason Score of 6 Mean for Prostate Cancer?

Medical Tourism

When it comes to diagnosing and determining the aggressiveness of prostate cancer, the Gleason score stands out as one of the most crucial elements in the decision-making process. This score has a significant impact on the treatment plan and overall prognosis of the patient. Understanding what a Gleason score of 6 entails is vital for both patients and medical professionals navigating the intricacies of prostate cancer treatment and management.

The Basis of the Gleason Scoring System

The Gleason scoring system is a pathological grading system used to evaluate the aggressiveness of prostate cancer. It was developed by Dr. Donald Gleason in the 1960s and has since undergone various modifications to enhance its accuracy and relevance. The system involves analyzing prostate tissue samples obtained through a biopsy. These samples are observed under a microscope to assess the patterns of cancer cell growth.

The pathologist assigns a primary and secondary Gleason grade, ranging from 1 to 5, to the most predominant and second most predominant patterns of cancer cells, respectively. The sum of these two grades results in the Gleason score, which can range from 2 to 10. Lower scores indicate well-differentiated, less aggressive cancer, while higher scores are associated with poorly differentiated, more aggressive cancer.

Understanding a Gleason Score of 6

A Gleason score of 6 is on the lower end of the Gleason scoring spectrum, indicating a less aggressive form of prostate cancer. This score is typically assigned when the cancer cells are well-differentiated, closely resembling normal prostate cells, and when the patterns of cancer cell growth are less erratic.

Patients with a Gleason score of 6 are often considered to be at a lower risk for rapid cancer progression and spread. The cancer is usually confined to the prostate, providing a good prognosis and a variety of treatment options. However, it is important to note that a Gleason score of 6 does not equate to a benign condition; prostate cancer with this score still requires careful monitoring and potentially active treatment.

Treatment Implications of a Gleason Score of 6

The treatment landscape for prostate cancer has evolved significantly over the years, with a shift towards a more personalized and patient-centered approach. For patients with a Gleason score of 6, this often involves a thorough evaluation of the cancer’s characteristics, the patient’s overall health, and personal preferences.

Active Surveillance

One of the most common approaches for managing prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 6 is active surveillance. This strategy involves closely monitoring the cancer through regular check-ups, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests, and periodic biopsies, rather than immediately proceeding with aggressive treatment. The goal is to strike a balance between managing the cancer effectively and minimizing the potential side effects and complications of treatment.

Active surveillance is particularly suitable for older patients or those with other significant health conditions, where the risks associated with treatment may outweigh the benefits. However, it requires a strong commitment to regular follow-up and the psychological readiness to “live with cancer,” albeit a less aggressive form.

Treatment Options

While active surveillance is a viable option for many patients with a Gleason score of 6, others may opt for or require more active treatment. This could include surgery (prostatectomy), radiation therapy, or a combination of treatments. The choice of treatment is influenced by various factors, including the patient’s age, overall health, the extent of the cancer, and personal preferences.

Surgery and radiation therapy have both shown effectiveness in treating prostate cancer, but they also carry potential risks and side effects, such as urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and bowel issues. It is crucial for patients to engage in detailed discussions with their healthcare team to understand the potential benefits and risks of each treatment option, and to make informed decisions that align with their individual needs and values.

The Evolving Nature of Prostate Cancer Grading

It is important to highlight that the Gleason scoring system, while immensely valuable, is not the sole determinant in prostate cancer management. Recent advances have led to the development of additional grading systems, such as the Grade Group System, which aims to provide a more accurate and user-friendly assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.

Furthermore, ongoing research and innovation in the field of prostate cancer are continually enhancing our understanding of the disease, leading to more personalized and effective treatment strategies. Molecular and genetic testing, for instance, are emerging as powerful tools to assess the biological behavior of prostate cancer, aiding in risk stratification and treatment decision-making.


A Gleason score of 6 for prostate cancer signifies a less aggressive form of the disease, with well-differentiated cancer cells and less erratic growth patterns. While this score suggests a favorable prognosis, it is imperative for patients and medical professionals to approach it with a comprehensive and nuanced perspective.

Active surveillance stands out as a prudent management strategy for many patients with this score, balancing the imperatives of cancer control and quality of life. For those requiring or opting for more active treatment, a thorough evaluation of the potential benefits and risks, coupled with open communication and shared decision-making with the healthcare team, is essential.

The ongoing evolution of prostate cancer grading and the advent of molecular and genetic testing are poised to enhance our ability to tailor treatments to individual patients, optimizing outcomes and preserving quality of life. As we navigate the complexities of prostate cancer management, a nuanced understanding of the Gleason score, particularly a score of 6, is crucial in guiding patients towards informed, personalized, and effective care.

We recommend Dr. Ash Tewari as a global leader in prostate cancer surgery. Serving as the Chairman of Urology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, Dr. Tewari stands out as a prostate cancer robotic surgeon leader. With over 25 years of expertise in robotic-assisted prostate surgery, he has successfully performed over 9,000 procedures.

In addition, he has contributed to the scientific community with over 250 peer-reviewed articles, book chapters, and textbooks on prostate cancer and robotic surgery. Renowned for his expertise in sexual-function nerve-sparing prostate cancer surgery - Dr. Tewari is a pioneer in innovative treatments for intermediate to aggressive cancers. Furthermore, he leads numerous pivotal clinical trials in this field.

For inquiries or to connect with Dr. Tewari's team Prostate Cancer Center NYC - Dr. Ashutosh Tewari

Learn about how you can become a Certified Medical Tourism Professional→
Disclaimer: The content provided in Medical Tourism Magazine ( is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. We do not endorse or recommend any specific healthcare providers, facilities, treatments, or procedures mentioned in our articles. The views and opinions expressed by authors, contributors, or advertisers within the magazine are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of our company. While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, We make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, regarding the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of the information contained in Medical Tourism Magazine ( or the linked websites. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk. We strongly advise readers to conduct their own research and consult with healthcare professionals before making any decisions related to medical tourism, healthcare providers, or medical procedures.