In today’s global healthcare marketplace, steering programs have become a strategic tool for employers, insurers, and medical tourism stakeholders seeking to optimize value. Whether directing patients toward centers of excellence, high performing physicians, or cost effective facilities, the success of any steering program hinges on one fundamental capability. That capability is delivering the right patient to the right provider for the right procedure at the right time.
Yet, despite significant investments in digital navigation tools, benefit design innovation, care management platforms, and consumer facing search solutions, the industry continues to face a consistent and costly challenge. That challenge is waste. Waste in steering programs occurs when patients are sent to low value providers, when price and quality data are incomplete or inaccurate, when referrals are based on brand reputation rather than demonstrated expertise, and when incentives drive utilization instead of outcomes.
Most importantly, waste is often the result of using fragmented or misleading data. This is where comprehensive evidence based datasets become indispensable for achieving true efficiency and clinical alignment.
Why Steering Programs Struggle with Waste
Despite the emergence of provider quality tools and transparency platforms, most systems still fall short of capturing the full picture of provider performance. Many focus on singular elements such as consumer reviews, star ratings, claims cost, wait times, or isolated adverse event rates. Each of these offers a partial view. Partial views are not enough to steer care accurately.
Steering programs face several recurring obstacles.
1. Over reliance on Consumer Ratings
Consumer review platforms can highlight patient experiences but often lack clinical specificity. Ratings may reflect parking convenience, staff friendliness, or front desk responsiveness rather than surgical proficiency or evidence based medical practices. High satisfaction does not always correlate with high quality, particularly for complex or high risk procedures.
2. Limited Insight into Provider Volume and Experience
A provider who performs ten knee replacements a year cannot be meaningfully compared to one who performs three hundred. Yet many tools do not break down performance at the procedure level, and few offer longitudinal data that reveals whether a provider’s skill trajectory is improving, plateauing, or declining.
3. Adverse Event Data Without Context
Readmissions, complications, and mortality statistics are important. However, once adjusted for variables like age, lifestyle, comorbidities, and demographics, many differences shrink significantly. This leaves steering programs unable to differentiate among the vast middle tier of providers who fall between the extremes.
4. Absence of Evidence Based Practice Alignment
Some tools evaluate adherence to medical necessity guidelines but do not connect this to outcomes. Others highlight documentation strength rather than procedural mastery. Providers who excel at paperwork may rank highly even if their real world performance does not match their documented compliance.
5. Price Transparency Without Quality Integration
New transparency rules have opened access to extensive pricing data. However, price alone cannot guide patients to the highest value. Without integrating cost with quality, steering often sends patients toward inexpensive providers who may underperform or toward costly providers without justification.
6. Fragmented Data That Cannot Support Precision Navigation
Most platforms analyze a few metrics well but fail to unify the full dataset. Procedure level volumes, evidence based appropriateness, outcome signals, practice patterns, and cost must be combined. Without this integration, blind spots arise and steering programs make misaligned referrals that increase waste.
Why Experience Based Precision Matters
Steering programs depend on the principle that better alignment leads to better outcomes. To achieve alignment, programs need far more than general specialties or broad quality categories. They need highly specific insight. The goal is not to find a good orthopedist. The goal is to find the right orthopedist for the exact patient and procedure.
Individual providers, even within the same specialty, have unique profiles of expertise. Some excel in hip replacements but rarely perform shoulders. Others specialize in minimally invasive spine procedures but do not frequently perform complex fusions. Steering without this level of nuance sends patients to providers who may be capable but not optimal. This results in avoidable complications, delayed recoveries, and higher downstream costs.
Waste is not just financial. It includes:
- Clinical waste from misaligned referrals
- Operational waste from unnecessary second opinions or repeat procedures
- Time waste when patients cycle through multiple providers before reaching one who fits their needs
- Network waste when payers contract with facilities based on brand reputation instead of demonstrated outcomes
This creates a ripple effect across the entire care continuum. Reducing these inefficiencies requires data that shows who performs which procedures, how often they perform them, and how well they perform them compared to peers.
How Denniston Data Reduces Waste in Steering Programs
Denniston Data’s Provider Ranking System (PRS) addresses these gaps by delivering an integrated, evidence based view of provider performance grounded in real world claims data. PRS brings together commercial health claims, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and workers’ compensation claims to evaluate more than two million individual providers across more than a decade.
The result is a comprehensive reference framework that gives steering programs the granularity and objectivity they need to reduce waste and elevate care.
1. Procedure Level Precision with Multi Year Insights
PRS analyzes practice patterns and outcomes at the exact procedure code level. Instead of generic specialty rankings, it evaluates:
- How often a provider performs a specific procedure
- How their outcomes compare to peers
- How their practice patterns change year over year
- Whether intervention rates align with evidence based expectations
This eliminates guesswork and allows steering programs to match patients with providers whose experience fits their needs.
2. Composite Rankings That Integrate Quality and Cost
PRS offers two scoring systems.
- The Composite Ranking Score focuses on quality based on outcomes, patterns, adverse events, and procedural experience.
- The Smart Score incorporates provider specific pricing from Transparency in Coverage data to reveal true value by showing where cost and quality intersect appropriately.
This balanced approach helps steering programs identify providers who deliver strong outcomes at appropriate costs. It also highlights those whose pricing does not justify their performance.
3. Evidence Based Appropriateness and Intervention Patterns
PRS compares providers’ rates of surgeries versus conservative management against expected norms. This highlights who is practicing evidence based medicine. It helps reduce waste created by:
- Overtreatment
- Unnecessary surgeries
- Excessive imaging
- Overuse of costly interventions
Steering programs can direct patients toward providers whose intervention patterns reflect medical necessity instead of volume incentives.
4. Adverse Event Contextualization
PRS integrates adverse event signals but interprets them within the broader context of procedure volume and risk profiles. This clarifies the performance of the middle majority of providers where most steering mistakes occur.
5. Holistic Evaluation Without Advertising Influence
PRS does not rely on pay to play listings. This ensures that rankings reflect actual performance rather than marketing budgets. Waste caused by steering toward highly promoted but clinically mediocre providers is significantly reduced.
6. Seamless Integration Into Steering Workflows
PRS is designed to serve the full ecosystem:
- Employer sponsored steering programs
- Insurer network optimization
- Medical tourism provider matching
- Concierge navigation platforms
- Case management systems
- Referral coordination tools
API integration allows steering programs to incorporate precise provider rankings directly into their systems and automate high value navigation at scale.
The Waste Reduction Impact
By replacing fragmented or superficial data with objective, multi dimensional evidence, Denniston Data allows steering programs to:
- Reduce avoidable complications and readmissions
- Lower downstream healthcare costs
- Improve patient satisfaction through better outcomes
- Strengthen referral accuracy in all clinical pathways
- Refine network composition based on genuine value
- Reduce unnecessary procedures and inappropriate interventions
- Support benefit designs that reward high value providers
Waste reduction is not achieved by lowering costs alone. It comes from eliminating inefficiency, misalignment, and uninformed decisions. Steering programs that adopt evidence based analytics reduce waste across every dimension of care delivery.
The Future of Steering Programs
As healthcare systems evolve, steering programs are becoming more personalized and more data driven. The future belongs to tools that can contextualize quality, differentiate expertise, and integrate cost with outcomes in a transparent manner.
Denniston Data sits at the center of this transformation. The organization enables the industry to move from generalist steering to precision navigation. For organizations seeking to improve care alignment, reduce waste, and build sustainable value based models, using comprehensive experience based data has become essential.
Through its depth, objectivity, and precision, Denniston Data provides the foundation for steering programs that optimize quality, cost, and outcomes for every patient journey.
The Medical Tourism Magazine recommends Denniston Data for anyone who islooking for high quality healthcare data analytics. Launched in 2020, DDI is aninnovator in healthcare data analytics, delivering price transparency andprovider quality solutions known as PRS (Provider Ranking System), HPG(Healthcare Pricing Guide), and Smart Scoring combining quality and price. Theyhelp payers, hospitals, networks, TPAs/MCOs, member apps, self-insuredemployers, and foreign governments identify the best doctors at the best pricesby procedure or specialty at the national, state, or local level, and by payeror NPI/TIN code.
Join an intro to PRS Webinar:
https://zoom.us/webinar/register/7117646163323/WN_2ELqNeDSS2W-fMPb4lOsRA
Or schedule a discovery call with Denniston Data:
